Quality Assurance Framework

Our Content Quality
Standards

Every piece of content on Enginist is scored on a 100-point scale across four dimensions. This transparent methodology ensures consistently high-quality engineering resources.

100
Point Quality Scale
4
Scoring Dimensions
SCORING METHODOLOGY

Four Dimensions of Quality

Each dimension contributes 25 points to the total score, ensuring balanced evaluation across all aspects of content quality.

Technical Accuracy
Verified formulas, industry standards citations, and fact-checkable claims.
25
points
Formula Quality
LaTeX formulas with proper notation
8 pts
Standards Citations
IEEE, IEC, ASHRAE, NEC references
7 pts
Source Credibility
Author credentials, disclaimers
5 pts
Fact-Checkability
Specific values, units, references
5 pts
Comprehensiveness
Deep topic coverage with FAQs, edge cases, and related content links.
25
points
Topic Coverage
Word count, section depth
8 pts
FAQ Inclusion
5+ common questions answered
5 pts
Edge Cases
Limitations, safety considerations
5 pts
Related Content
Calculator links, internal links
4 pts
Use Cases
Practical applications covered
3 pts
Readability & Structure
Scannable content optimized for technical professionals.
25
points
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Target grade level 8-12
8 pts
Scannable Structure
Headings, lists, visual breaks
7 pts
Visual Aids
Diagrams, tables, callouts
5 pts
Sentence Length
Optimal 15-20 words average
5 pts
User Value & Utility
Practical applicability with worked examples and calculator integration.
25
points
Practical Applicability
Real-world values, step-by-step
8 pts
Calculator Integration
Links to related tools
7 pts
Worked Examples
Step-by-step solutions
5 pts
Authentic Content
Human-written, no AI filler
5 pts
GRADE SCALE

Quality Grades Explained

Scores translate to letter grades for quick quality assessment.

A+
95-100 points
Exceptional quality, reference-worthy
Recommended
A
90-94 points
Excellent, comprehensive coverage
Recommended
B+
85-89 points
Very good, minor improvements possible
Recommended
B
80-84 points
Good quality, meets standards
C
70-79 points
Adequate, needs improvement
D
60-69 points
Below standard, significant gaps
F
0-59 points
Does not meet quality standards
WHY TRUST US

Built on Expertise & Transparency

Our commitment to quality goes beyond scoring—it's embedded in how we create and maintain content.

Industry Standards

Every guide references recognized standards like IEEE, IEC, ASHRAE, and NEC.

Verified Formulas

Mathematical formulas are validated against textbooks and professional references.

Engineer Authors

Content is written and reviewed by practicing engineers with domain expertise.

Transparent Methodology

Our scoring algorithm is documented and consistently applied across all content.

Google E-E-A-T Aligned

Aligned with Google's Quality Guidelines

Our scoring methodology is designed to align with Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) framework, ensuring our content meets the highest standards for search quality.

ExperienceExpertiseAuthoritativenessTrustworthiness

Experience Quality Content

Browse our library of technical guides and calculators, all scored and evaluated using this transparent methodology.