Guides
ElectricalIntermediate15 min
ReviewedStandards-Based

Cable Sizing Guide | IEC 60364 Standards

Complete cable size calculation guide with formulas, standards (IEC 60364-5-52), and step-by-step examples. Learn how to calculate electrical cable sizing for ampacity, voltage drop, and current carrying capacity with free calculator.

Michael Chen, P.E., LEED AP
Michael Chen, P.E., LEED AP is a licensed Professional Engineer with 15+ years of experience in electrical system design for industrial and commercial facilities. He holds an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from UC Berkeley and has designed power distribution systems for data centers, manufacturing plants, and high-rise buildings. Michael is a member of IEEE Power & Energy Society and has contributed to IEC technical committees on cable sizing standards.
Reviewed by PE-Licensed Electrical Engineers
Published: October 12, 2025
Updated: December 4, 2025

Table of Contents

Cable Sizing Guide: IEC 60364-5-52 Standards

Quick AnswerHow do you calculate cable size per IEC 60364?
Size cables using the ampacity formula with derating factors for temperature, grouping, and installation. Verify voltage drop stays within limits (3% for lighting, 5% for power).
It=IbK1×K2×K3I_t = \frac{I_b}{K_1 \times K_2 \times K_3} and ΔV=3×I×L×R1000\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times I \times L \times R}{1000}
Example

50A load with combined derating K=0.63 needs 80A rated cable—select 25mm² copper XLPE (88A) per IEC 60364-5-52

Introduction

In March 2021, a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant in New Jersey experienced a catastrophic production shutdown when their main distribution cable failed during peak summer demand. The 185mm² feeder cable, originally sized for 400A continuous load, was now serving 520A after facility expansions—but no one had recalculated the derating factors. At 42°C ambient with six cables bundled in the same tray, the effective ampacity had dropped to just 380A. The cable insulation degraded over three years of chronic overheating, ultimately causing a $2.3 million fire and 11 weeks of lost production. A proper cable sizing calculation would have flagged this issue for under $15,000 in cable upgrades.

Loading visualizer...

The cable connecting source to load must accomplish two critical tasks simultaneously: carry current without overheating, and deliver voltage without excessive drop. Getting either wrong creates problems—from fire hazards with undersized cables to wasted capital with oversized ones.

Why This Calculation Matters

A cable that can safely carry 50A based on ampacity tables might still fail your installation if it's 100 meters long and drops 8% of the supply voltage. Conversely, a cable sized perfectly for voltage drop might run too hot in a conduit with other cables. Every installation requires checking both criteria, and the larger cable size governs. This dual requirement catches many engineers who focus only on current-carrying capacity.

The Fundamental Challenge

Cable sizing involves multiple interacting factors: ambient temperature, installation method, cable grouping, insulation type, conductor material, and circuit length. A 16mm² cable might carry 80A in free air but only 50A when bundled with other cables in a warm environment. Temperature correction factors, grouping factors, and installation method factors all compound, making the effective current rating significantly different from the base value in standard tables. This guide systematically addresses these derating factors.

What You'll Learn

This guide covers the complete cable sizing methodology per IEC 60364-5-52 standards. You'll master the ampacity-based sizing with correction factors (K₁, K₂, K₃), voltage drop verification for single-phase and three-phase circuits, and the process for selecting from standard conductor sizes per IEC 60228. Practical examples demonstrate the complete workflow from load calculation to final cable selection with code compliance verification.

Quick Answer: Cable Size Calculation Formula

Cable sizing requires two critical calculations: ampacity-based sizing and voltage drop verification.

Core Formulas

Calculation TypeFormulaApplication
Ampacity-Based SizingIt=IbK1×K2×K3I_t = \frac{I_b}{K_1 \times K_2 \times K_3}Determines minimum cable rating based on load and conditions
Voltage Drop (Single-Phase)ΔV=2×I×L×R1000\Delta V = \frac{2 \times I \times L \times R}{1000}Verifies potential drop for single-phase systems
Electrical potential Drop (Three-Phase)ΔV=3×I×L×R1000\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times I \times L \times R}{1000}Verifies V value drop for three-phase systems

Parameters:

  • ItI_t = Required conductor rating (A)
  • IbI_b = Design load current (A)
  • K1K_1 = Temperature correction factor
  • K2K_2 = Grouping correction factor
  • K3K_3 = Installation method correction factor
  • II = Load current (A)
  • LL = Electrical line length one way (m)
  • RR = Resistance per km (Ω/km)

Voltage Drop Limits

Standard Sizing Process

  1. Calculate design amperage (IbI_b) from load power
  2. Apply correction factors (K1,K2K_1, K_2, K3K_3) for installation conditions
  3. Select wiring from IEC 60228 standard sizes
  4. Verify volt level drop (ΔV%\Delta V\%) is within limits
  5. Confirm protection coordination with overcurrent devices

Quick Example: Three-Phase Motor Circuit

15kW Motor at 400V

Given:

  • Motor power: 15 kW
  • Potential: 400V, three-phase
  • Electrical power factor: 0.85
  • Lead length: 40 m
  • Installation: Clipped direct (Method C), 35°C ambient, 2 cables grouped
  • Material: Copper, XLPE 90°C insulation

Step 1: Calculate Design Electrical flow

Ib=150003×400×0.85=25.5 AI_b = \frac{15000}{\sqrt{3} \times 400 \times 0.85} = 25.5 \text{ A}

Step 2: Apply Correction Factors

  • K1K_1 (35°C, XLPE): 0.96
  • K2K_2 (2 cables): 0.85
  • K3K_3 (Method C): 0.95
It=25.50.96×0.85×0.95=32.9 AI_t = \frac{25.5}{0.96 \times 0.85 \times 0.95} = 32.9 \text{ A}

Step 3: Select Wire From tables: 6mm2 XLPE (47A three-phase rating) ✔

Step 4: Verify Electrical potential Drop For 6mm2 copper: R = 3.39 Ω/km

ΔV=3×25.5×40×3.391000=5.2 V\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times 25.5 \times 40 \times 3.39}{1000} = 5.2 \text{ V}ΔV%=5.2400×100=1.3%\Delta V\% = \frac{5.2}{400} \times 100 = 1.3\%

1.3% < 5% limit ✔

Result: Use 6mm2 copper XLPE conductor

Reference Values

ParameterTypical RangeStandard
Voltage Drop Limit (Lighting)3% maximumIEC 60364-5-52
Voltage Drop Limit (Power)5% maximumIEC 60364-5-52
Temperature Correction (K₁)0.71-1.00Based on ambient temperature
Grouping Correction (K₂)0.60-1.00Based on number of cables
Installation Method (K₃)0.70-1.00Based on installation type
Standard Cable Sizes1.5, 2.5, 4, 6, 10, 16, 25, 35, 50, 70, 95, 120, 150, 185, 240, 300 mm²IEC 60228

Key Standards


1 Introduction to Cable Sizing

Electrical line sizing involves determining the minimum conductor cross-sectional area required to:

  1. Carry the load amperage safely without exceeding temperature limits (ampacity)
  2. Limit electric tension drop to acceptable levels (typically 3-5%)
  3. Withstand short-circuit currents for protection device operating times
  4. Account for installation conditions and environmental factors

Key Standards

  • IEC 60364-5-52: Low-voltage electrical installations - Selection and erection of electrical equipment - Wiring systems
  • IEC 60287: Electric cables - Calculation of current rating
  • IEC 60228: Conductors of insulated cables

2 Ampacity-Based Sizing

2.1 Base Current-Carrying Capacity

The ampacity (IzI_z) is the maximum amp a wiring can carry continuously without exceeding its heat rating.

Standard reference conditions:

  • Ambient thermal value: 30°C for cables in air, 20°C for buried cables
  • Single circuit
  • Installation method reference (e.g., Method C - clipped direct on non-metallic surface)

2.2 Correction Factors

The actual electric current-carrying capacity must account for installation conditions:

Iz=Ib×K1×K2×K3I_z = I_{b} \times K_{1} \times K_{2} \times K_3

Where:

  • IbI_b = Design load I value (A)
  • K1K_1 = Degree correction factor
  • K2K_2 = Grouping correction factor
  • K3K_3 = Installation method correction factor

Temperature Correction (K1K_1)

For PVC thermal resistance (70°C max):

Ambient Temp25°C30°C35°C40°C45°C50°C
Factor K1K_11.031.000.940.870.790.71

For XLPE thermal protection (90°C max):

Ambient Temp25°C30°C35°C40°C45°C50°C
Factor K1K_11.041.000.960.910.870.82
Temperature Derating Factor (K₁)
How ambient temperature affects cable current-carrying capacity
PVC insulation (max 70°C)
XLPE insulation (max 90°C)

At 50°C ambient

PVC: -29% capacity

At 50°C ambient

XLPE: -18% capacity

XLPE advantage

+11% more capacity

Grouping Correction (K2K_2)

Number of cables grouped together affects heat dissipation:

CablesEnclosedOn WallIn AirUnderground
11.001.001.001.00
20.800.850.880.90
30.700.790.820.85
4-60.650.730.770.80
7-90.600.680.730.75
10-200.500.620.680.70
Grouping Derating Factor (K₂)
Capacity reduction when multiple cables are installed together
Enclosed conduit
On wall
In air (tray)
Underground

Worst case (10+ enclosed)

-50% capacity!

Typical (3 cables on wall)

-21% capacity

Best case (single cable)

No derating

Installation Method Factor (K3K_3)

MethodDescriptionFactor
A1/A2Enclosed conduit in thermally insulated wall0.50
B1/B2Enclosed conduit on wall/spaced from wall0.80
CClipped direct (non-metallic surface)0.95
D/EIn air on lead tray/ladder1.00
D1Underground direct burial1.00

2.3 Standard Cable Sizes (IEC 60228)

Copper conductor cross-sections (mm2): 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 6, 10, 16, 25, 35, 50, 70, 95, 120, 150, 185, 240, 300, 400, 500, 630

Aluminum conductor cross-sections (mm2): 16, 25, 35, 50, 70, 95, 120, 150, 185, 240, 300, 400, 500, 630

2.4 Current-Carrying Capacity Tables

Copper PVC 70°C - Method C (Clipped Direct):

Size (mm2)Single Phase (A)Three Phase (A)
1.517.515.5
2.52421
43228
64136
105750
167668
2510189
35125110
50151134
70192171
95232207
120269239
150309275

Copper XLPE 90°C - Method C (Clipped Direct):

Size (mm2)Single Phase (A)Three Phase (A)
1.52320
2.53127
44237
65447
107566
1610089
25133117
35164145
50198175
70253224
95306271
120354314
150407361
Current-Carrying Capacity by Cable Size
Ampacity comparison for copper cables - Method C (clipped direct)
XLPE 90°C (Single-phase)
PVC 70°C (Single-phase)
━━ Single-phase- - - Three-phase

Typical residential (2.5mm²)

PVC: 24A / XLPE: 31A

Industrial motor (35mm²)

PVC: 125A / XLPE: 164A

Heavy feeder (120mm²)

PVC: 269A / XLPE: 354A

3 Voltage Drop Calculations

3.1 Maximum Allowable Voltage Drop

Per IEC 60364-5-52:

  • Lighting circuits: 3% maximum
  • Other uses: 5% maximum
  • Combined (from origin): 5% maximum total

3.2 Voltage Drop Formulas

Single-Phase (two-wire) Systems:

ΔV=2×I×L×(Rcosϕ+Xsinϕ)1000\Delta V = \frac{2 \times I \times L \times (R \cos\phi + X \sin\phi)}{1000}

Three-Phase (three-wire or four-wire) Systems:

ΔV=3×I×L×(Rcosϕ+Xsinϕ)1000\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times I \times L \times (R \cos\phi + X \sin\phi)}{1000}

Note: This formula is already correctly wrapped in LaTeX math mode.

Where:

  • ΔV\Delta V = Potential drop (V)
  • II = Load amperage (A)
  • LL = Wire length one way (m)
  • RR = Resistance per km (Ω/km)
  • XX = Reactance per km (Ω/km)
  • cosϕ\cos\phi = Load factor
  • sinϕ\sin\phi = Reactive factor

Percentage electrical potential drop:

ΔV%=ΔVV×100\Delta V\% = \frac{\Delta V}{V} \times 100

3.3 Cable Resistance Values (at 70°C)

Copper conductors (Ω/km):

Size (mm2)R (Ω/km)X (Ω/km)
1.513.300.145
2.58.210.135
45.090.125
63.390.120
102.000.110
161.240.105
250.7950.100
350.5650.095
500.3930.090
700.2770.085
950.2060.082
1200.1610.080
1500.1290.078

Aluminum conductors (Ω/km):

Size (mm2)R (Ω/km)X (Ω/km)
162.030.105
251.300.100
350.9270.095
500.6410.090
700.4530.085
950.3370.082
1200.2650.080
1500.2110.078

3.4 Simplified Voltage Drop (for cosϕ=0.8\cos \phi = 0.8)

For typical capacity factor 0.8 and short conductor runs where X·sin ϕ\phi is negligible:

Single-phase: ΔV2×I×L×R1000\Delta V \approx \frac{2 \times I \times L \times R}{1000}

Three-phase: ΔV1.732×I×L×R1000\Delta V \approx \frac{1.732 \times I \times L \times R}{1000}

4 Practical Cable Sizing Procedure

Step 1: Determine Design Current (IbI_b)

From connected load energy:

Single-phase: Ib=PV×cosϕI_b = \frac{P}{V \times \cos\phi}

Three-phase: Ib=P3×V×cosϕI_b = \frac{P}{\sqrt{3} \times V \times \cos\phi}

Note: The 3\sqrt{3} formulas above are already correctly wrapped in LaTeX math mode.

Step 2: Apply Correction Factors

Measure required base electrical flow rating:

It=IbK1×K2×K3I_t = \frac{I_{b}}{K_{1} \times K_{2} \times K_{3}}

Step 3: Select Cable from Tables

Choose the smallest standard electrical line size with amp rating It\geq I_t

Step 4: Verify Voltage Drop

Assess V value drop for selected wiring. If ΔV%>\Delta V\% > allowable limit, select next larger lead size.

Step 5: Check Short-Circuit Rating

Verify wire can withstand fault electric current for protection device operating time (beyond this guide's scope).

5 Worked Examples

Example 1: Three-Phase Motor Circuit

Given:

  • Machine electrical power: 15 kW
  • Electric tension: 400V, three-phase
  • Wattage factor: 0.85
  • Conductor length: 40m
  • Installation: Clipped direct on wall (Method C)
  • Ambient heat level: 35°C
  • 2 cables grouped together
  • Heat barrier: XLPE 90°C
  • Material: Copper

Step 1: Design I value

Ib=150003×400×0.85=15000589.26=25.5AI_b = \frac{15000}{\sqrt{3} \times 400 \times 0.85} = \frac{15000}{589.26} = 25.5A

Step 2: Correction factors

  • K1K_1 (35°C for XLPE): 0.96
  • K2K_2 (2 cables on wall): 0.85
  • K3K_3 (Method C): 0.95

Required rating: It=25.50.96×0.85×0.95=25.50.775=32.9AI_t = \frac{25.5}{0.96 \times 0.85 \times 0.95} = \frac{25.5}{0.775} = 32.9A

Step 3: Select electrical line

From tables, 6mm2 XLPE has 47A rating (three-phase) > 32.9A ✔

Step 4: Check volt level drop

For 6mm2 copper: R = 3.39 Ω/km,X=0.120Ω\Omega/km, X = 0.120 \Omega/km

ΔV=3×25.5×40×(3.39×0.85+0.120×0.527)1000\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times 25.5 \times 40 \times (3.39 \times 0.85 + 0.120 \times 0.527)}{1000}

ΔV=1.732×25.5×40×(2.88+0.063)1000=5.2V\Delta V = \frac{1.732 \times 25.5 \times 40 \times (2.88 + 0.063)}{1000} = 5.2V

ΔV%=5.2400×100=1.3%\Delta V\% = \frac{5.2}{400} \times 100 = 1.3\%

1.3% < 5% allowable ✔

Result: Use 6mm2 copper XLPE wiring

Example 2: Single-Phase Lighting Circuit

Given:

  • Load: 3.5 kW
  • Potential: 230V, single-phase
  • Load factor: 1.0 (resistive)
  • Lead length: 25m
  • Installation: In conduit on wall (Method B)
  • Ambient temp: 30°C
  • Single circuit
  • Isolation: PVC 70°C
  • Material: Copper

Step 1: Design amperage

Ib=3500230×1.0=15.2AI_b = \frac{3500}{230 \times 1.0} = 15.2A

Step 2: Correction factors

  • K1K_1 (30°C for PVC): 1.00
  • K2K_2 (single circuit): 1.00
  • K3K_3 (Method B): 0.80

Required rating: It=15.21.00×1.00×0.80=19.0AI_t = \frac{15.2}{1.00 \times 1.00 \times 0.80} = 19.0A

Step 3: Select wire

From tables, 2.5mm2 PVC has 24A rating (single-phase) > 19.0A ✔

Step 4: Check electrical potential drop (lighting: 3% max)

For 2.5mm2 copper: R = 8.21 Ω/km

ΔV=2×15.2×25×8.211000=6.2V\Delta V = \frac{2 \times 15.2 \times 25 \times 8.21}{1000} = 6.2V

ΔV%=6.2230×100=2.7%\Delta V\% = \frac{6.2}{230} \times 100 = 2.7\%

2.7% < 3% allowable ✔

Result: Use 2.5mm2 copper PVC conductor

6 Common Design Considerations

6.1 Oversizing Benefits

Consider upsizing electrical line when:

  • Future load expansion is likely (+20-30%)
  • Very long wiring runs (over 100m)
  • Critical circuits requiring high reliability
  • Energy savings from reduced I2R losses justify cost

6.2 Aluminum vs Copper

Aluminum advantages:

  • Lower material cost
  • Lighter weight (important for long runs)
  • Suitable for larger sizes (greater than 35mm2)

Copper advantages:

  • Higher conductivity (1.6×1.6 \times aluminum)
  • Better mechanical strength
  • Easier termination
  • Preferred for smaller sizes (less than 35mm2)
Copper vs Aluminum Conductors
Material property comparison for cable selection
Copper (Cu)
Aluminum (Al)

Choose Copper when:

  • • Size < 35mm²
  • • Complex routing/bending
  • • Easy termination needed

Choose Aluminum when:

  • • Size > 35mm²
  • • Long runs (weight matters)
  • • Cost is primary concern

6.3 Insulation Selection

PVC (70°C):

  • Lower cost
  • Suitable for most general applications
  • Max continuous thermal reading: 70°C
  • Short-circuit heat: 160°C

XLPE (90°C):

  • Higher continuous thermal value rating
  • Better thermal and electrical properties
  • Longer service life
  • 20-30% higher ampacity than PVC
  • Short-circuit degree: 250°C
  • Preferred for industrial applications

6.4 Parallel Cables

For very high currents, multiple cables in parallel may be more economical than single large lead:

Requirements:

  • Same length, cross-section, material, construction
  • Equal load sharing
  • Derating factor for grouping applies
  • Terminations must ensure equal electrical flow distribution

7 Safety and Compliance

7.1 Protection Coordination

Wire must be protected by overcurrent device (MCB/MCCB/Fuse):

InIz×CcI_n \leq I_{z} \times C_c

Where:

  • InI_n = Nominal amp of protective device
  • IzI_z = Electric current-carrying capacity of conductor
  • CcC_c = Capacity correction factor

7.2 Fault Protection

Electrical line must withstand short-circuit I value (IkI_k) for fault clearing time (tt):

SIktkS \geq \frac{I_{k} \sqrt{t}}{k}

Where:

  • SS = Minimum cross-sectional area (mm2)
  • IkI_k = Short-circuit amperage (A)
  • tt = Fault clearing time (s)
  • kk = Material/thermal resistance constant (115 for Cu/PVC, 143 for Cu/XLPE)

7.3 Environmental Considerations

Account for:

  • Ambient heat level: Derating above 30°C
  • Burial depth: Thermal resistance increases with depth
  • Soil thermal resistivity: 2.5 K·m/W standard, derate if higher
  • Solar radiation: Add 15-20°C for cables in direct sun
  • Chemical exposure: Select appropriate thermal protection/sheath

8 Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Ignoring correction factors - Always apply K1,K2K_1, K_2, K3K_3
  2. Using nominal V value for electric tension drop - Use actual system volt level
  3. Forgetting wiring length is one-way - Total circuit length = 2x lead length
  4. Neglecting future loads - Size for expected growth
  5. Wrong capacity factor assumption - Verify actual load characteristics
  6. Not considering installation method - Significant impact on ampacity
  7. Mixing conductor materials - Don't mix copper and aluminum
  8. Inadequate short-circuit protection - Always verify fault withstand

9 Quick Reference Tables

Typical Conductor Temperatures

Heat barrier TypeMax Continuous (°C)Short-Circuit (°C)
PVC70160
XLPE90250
EPR90250

Standard Voltage Levels (IEC 60038)

SystemNominal PotentialTolerance
LV Single-phase230V±10%
LV Three-phase400V±10%
MV (Europe)10kV, 20kV±10%

Cable Selection Flowchart Summary

  1. Determine design electrical flow (IbI_b)
  2. Determine correction factors (K1,K2K_1, K_2, K3K_3)
  3. Compute required rating (It=IbK1×K2×K3I_t = \frac{I_b}{K_1 \times K_2 \times K_3})
  4. Select wire from tables (IzItI_z \geq I_t)
  5. Verify electrical potential drop (ΔV%\Delta V\% \le limit)
  6. Check protection coordination
  7. Verify short-circuit withstand (if applicable)

Real-World Case Studies

Case Study 1: Data Center UPS Feeder Upgrade

Tier III Data Center - 2MW UPS System

Situation: A colocation data center needed to upgrade their UPS capacity from 1MW to 2MW. The existing 240mm² copper cables were rated for 500A but the new load required 800A at 0.95 PF.

Original Installation:

  • Cable: 2×(3×240mm²) copper XLPE per phase
  • Length: 45m from transformer room to UPS
  • Installation: Cable tray with 8 other circuits
  • Ambient: 35°C (data center electrical room)

Problem Analysis:

Base ampacity for 240mm² XLPE (Method E): 485A per cable

Applying correction factors:

  • K1K_1 (35°C ambient): 0.96
  • K2K_2 (8 cables grouped): 0.72
  • K3K_3 (perforated tray): 1.00
Iz=485×0.96×0.72×1.00=335 A per cableI_z = 485 \times 0.96 \times 0.72 \times 1.00 = 335\text{ A per cable}

With 2 cables per phase: 2×335=670 A2 \times 335 = 670\text{ A}Insufficient for 800A!

Solution:

Upgraded to 3×(3×185mm²) cables per phase with improved spacing:

  • K2K_2 improved to 0.80 with 150mm spacing
  • New capacity: 3×362×0.96×0.80=835 A3 \times 362 \times 0.96 \times 0.80 = 835\text{ A}

Lesson: Parallel cable runs require careful grouping factor analysis. Adding more cables without proper spacing can actually reduce total ampacity due to mutual heating.

Case Study 2: Solar Farm DC Cable Fire

50MW Solar Installation - DC String Cables

Incident: A utility-scale solar farm experienced cable fires in multiple combiner boxes during peak summer production.

Root Cause Investigation:

  • String cables: 6mm² copper, 85m average run
  • Design current: 10.5A per string (IEC 60364 standard)
  • Actual current measured: 11.2A (module overperformance)

The Critical Mistake:

Designer used standard 30°C ambient temperature for derating. However:

  • Rooftop mounting with dark surface: actual ambient 55°C
  • No airflow in enclosed cable trays

Correction at 55°C for PVC insulation:

K1=70557030=0.61K_1 = \sqrt{\frac{70 - 55}{70 - 30}} = 0.61

6mm² PVC rated at 41A × 0.61 = 25A ✔ (appeared adequate)

But with grouping of 24 strings per tray:

K2=0.38(20+ cables)K_2 = 0.38 \quad \text{(20+ cables)}Iz=41×0.61×0.38=9.5 AI_z = 41 \times 0.61 \times 0.38 = 9.5\text{ A}

Actual load of 11.2A exceeded derated capacity by 18%, causing chronic overheating.

Solution:

  1. Replaced with 10mm² cables (59A × 0.61 × 0.38 = 13.7A capacity)
  2. Installed cable trays with ventilation gaps
  3. Reduced strings per tray to 12 maximum

Lesson: Solar installations require extreme temperature derating. The 55-60°C ambient above dark surfaces is commonly underestimated.

Case Study 3: Industrial Motor Voltage Drop Failure

Cement Plant - 200kW Crusher Motor

Problem: A 200kW crusher motor failed to start reliably, tripping on undervoltage protection during summer afternoons.

System Details:

  • Motor: 200kW, 400V, 3-phase, 0.87 PF, 340A FLA
  • Cable: 95mm² copper XLPE, 180m run
  • Starting current: 6× FLA = 2040A

Voltage Drop Analysis:

At 70°C operating temperature:

R70=0.193×1.197=0.231Ω/kmR_{70} = 0.193 \times 1.197 = 0.231\,\Omega/\text{km}

Running voltage drop:

ΔV=3×340×0.180×(0.231×0.87+0.08×0.49)1000=23.4 V\Delta V = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times 340 \times 0.180 \times (0.231 \times 0.87 + 0.08 \times 0.49)}{1000} = 23.4\text{ V}

Running drop: 23.4V / 400V = 5.9% ⚠️ Marginal but acceptable

Starting voltage drop:

ΔVstart=3×2040×0.180×0.231000=146 V\Delta V_{start} = \frac{\sqrt{3} \times 2040 \times 0.180 \times 0.23}{1000} = 146\text{ V}

Starting drop: 146V / 400V = 36.5% ✘ Motor receives only 254V!

Solution:

  1. Upgraded to 150mm² cable → Starting drop reduced to 22%
  2. Added soft starter → Starting current limited to 3× FLA
  3. Final starting voltage: 400V × (1 - 0.11) = 356V ✔

Lesson: Motor starting current creates voltage drops 5-7× higher than running conditions. Always calculate starting voltage drop for motors with long cable runs.

Quick Reference Card

Cable Selection Decision Matrix

ScenarioPrimary ConcernTypical Solution
Long runs (>50m)Voltage dropIncrease cable size 1-2 steps
Hot environments (>40°C)Temperature deratingUse XLPE instead of PVC
Multiple cables groupedGrouping factorIncrease spacing or cable size
Motor circuitsStarting voltage dropSize for 6× FLA starting current
Critical loadsRedundancyParallel cables with 20% margin

Derating Factor Quick Reference

ConditionTypical FactorImpact
35°C ambient (PVC)0.94-6% capacity
40°C ambient (PVC)0.87-13% capacity
45°C ambient (XLPE)0.87-13% capacity
3 cables grouped0.79-21% capacity
6 cables grouped0.73-27% capacity
Enclosed conduit0.80-20% capacity
Direct burial1.00No reduction

Design Checklist

10 Conclusion

Proper cable sizing requires careful consideration of multiple factors including design current, correction factors for installation conditions, voltage drop limits, and short-circuit ratings. By following the systematic approach outlined in this guide and applying IEC 60364-5-52 standards, engineers can select cables that ensure electrical safety, system reliability, and energy efficiency. Always verify calculations with manufacturer data and local electrical codes, and consult licensed electrical engineers for complex installations.

Export as PDF — Generate professional reports for documentation, client presentations, or permit submissions.


Key Takeaways

  • Cable sizing requires two critical verifications: ampacity-based sizing using correction factors (K₁, K₂, K₃) and voltage drop verification to ensure compliance with 3-5% limits
  • Apply correction factors for ambient temperature (K₁), cable grouping (K₂), and installation method (K₃) to determine actual current-carrying capacity
  • Voltage drop limits: 3% maximum for lighting circuits and 5% maximum for power circuits per IEC 60364-5-52
  • Always select the smallest standard cable size (per IEC 60228) that meets both ampacity and voltage drop requirements
  • Verify short-circuit ratings to ensure cables can withstand fault currents for protection device operating times
  • Consider economic optimization balancing initial cost against energy losses over the cable's lifetime

References & Standards

This guide follows established engineering principles and standards. For detailed requirements, always consult the current adopted edition in your jurisdiction.

Primary Standards

IEC 60364-5-52 Low-voltage electrical installations - Part 5-52: Selection and erection of electrical equipment - Wiring systems. Specifies cable sizing requirements, correction factors, and voltage drop limits.

IEC 60287 Electric cables - Calculation of the current rating. Provides methods for calculating current-carrying capacity under various installation conditions.

IEC 60228 Conductors of insulated cables. Defines standard conductor sizes and resistance values.

Supporting Standards & Guidelines

National Electrical Code (NEC) Comprehensive electrical safety standards for the United States. Article 310 specifies conductor ampacity requirements.

IEEE Standards Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers technical standards for electrical installations.

IEC 60050 - International Electrotechnical Vocabulary International standards for electrical terminology and definitions.

NEMA Publications National Electrical Manufacturers Association standards for electrical equipment.

Further Reading

Note: Standards and codes are regularly updated. Always verify you're using the current adopted edition applicable to your project's location. Consult with local authorities having jurisdiction (AHJ) for specific requirements.


Disclaimer: This guide provides general technical information based on international electrical standards. Always verify calculations with applicable local electrical codes (NEC, IEC, BS 7671, etc.) and consult licensed electrical engineers or electricians for actual installations. Electrical work should only be performed by qualified professionals. Component ratings and specifications may vary by manufacturer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cable Sizing Guide | Enginist