Comparisons
electricalComparison

Voltage Drop vs Power Loss

Voltage drop vs power loss explained: formulas, calculations, and practical impact on electrical systems. Learn when each matters and how to minimize both.

Enginist Team
Published: October 31, 2025
Updated: November 15, 2025

Table of Contents

Voltage Drop vs Power Loss: Understanding the Critical Difference

Quick AnswerWhat's the difference between voltage drop and power loss?
Voltage drop (Vd = I × Z) is the reduction in voltage across a conductor, affecting equipment performance. Power loss (P = I²R) is energy dissipated as heat, affecting operating costs. They're related but distinct—voltage drop determines if equipment will function properly; power loss determines energy efficiency. Both increase with current and conductor resistance.

Quick Verdict

Voltage drop and power loss are two sides of the same coin—both result from current flowing through conductor resistance, but they measure different things and matter for different reasons.

Voltage drop is your primary concern for equipment functionality. If voltage at the load drops too low, motors won't start, lights will dim, and electronics may malfunction. Code limits (typically 3-5%) exist specifically to prevent these problems.

Power loss is your primary concern for operating economics. Energy dissipated as heat in conductors is wasted—you pay for it but get no useful work. For continuous loads, power losses can cost thousands of dollars annually.

Bottom Line: Design to voltage drop limits first (code compliance), then evaluate power losses for economic optimization. Long-run circuits often justify larger conductors than code minimums require.

At-a-Glance Comparison Table

AspectVoltage DropPower Loss
FormulaVd=I×RV_d = I \times R (DC)P=I2RP = I^2 R
UnitsVolts (V)Watts (W)
Typical Limit3-5% of source voltageNo code limit (economic)
AffectsEquipment operationEnergy costs, heating
Scales WithCurrent (linear)Current (squared)
MitigationLarger conductorLarger conductor, higher voltage
MeasurementVoltmeter at loadAmmeter + resistance calculation
Code ReferenceNEC 210.19(A), 215.2(A)None (efficiency standards)

The Fundamental Relationship

Voltage drop and power loss are mathematically connected through Ohm's Law and the power equation:

Vd=I×RV_d = I \times R Ploss=I2R=Vd×IP_{loss} = I^2 R = V_d \times I

This relationship reveals a critical insight: power loss equals voltage drop times current. Both phenomena share the same root cause (conductor resistance), but their implications differ.

Voltage Drop: Detailed Analysis

Voltage drop is the reduction in electrical potential along a conductor caused by current flowing through its impedance. For equipment to operate properly, sufficient voltage must arrive at the load.

Voltage Drop Formulas

DC Circuits (single-phase): Vd=2×I×R×LV_d = 2 \times I \times R \times L

AC Circuits (single-phase): Vd=2×I×L×(Rcos⁡θ+Xsin⁡θ)V_d = 2 \times I \times L \times (R \cos\theta + X \sin\theta)

AC Circuits (three-phase): Vd=3×I×L×(Rcos⁡θ+Xsin⁡θ)V_d = \sqrt{3} \times I \times L \times (R \cos\theta + X \sin\theta)

Where:

  • II = current (amperes)
  • RR = resistance (ohms per unit length)
  • XX = reactance (ohms per unit length)
  • LL = one-way length (meters or feet)
  • θ\theta = power factor angle
  • Factor of 2 accounts for round-trip (supply + return)

Voltage Drop Code Requirements

StandardBranch CircuitFeederTotal (Combined)
NEC (Recommended)3% max3% max5% max
IEC 603643%5% (with diversity)5%
AS/NZS 30005%5%5%
Sensitive Equipment2%2%3%

Effects of Excessive Voltage Drop

Motors:

  • Starting torque proportional to voltage squared: 10% voltage drop = 19% torque reduction
  • Running current increases, causing overheating
  • Service factor reduced, shortened lifespan

Lighting:

  • Incandescent: Light output proportional to V3.4V^{3.4} (10% drop = 30% dimming)
  • LED drivers may not regulate properly below 90% voltage
  • Fluorescent ballasts may not strike arc

Electronics:

  • Power supply regulation limits exceeded
  • Logic circuits may malfunction
  • Increased ripple current in capacitors

Example Calculation: Voltage Drop

Industrial Feeder: 480V, 200A, 150m

Given:

  • Source voltage: 480V three-phase
  • Load current: 200A
  • One-way length: 150m
  • Conductor: 95mm² copper in steel conduit
  • Power factor: 0.85 lagging
  • R = 0.193 Ω/km, X = 0.072 Ω/km (from cable tables)

Calculate voltage drop:

Vd=3×I×L×(Rcos⁡θ+Xsin⁡θ)V_d = \sqrt{3} \times I \times L \times (R \cos\theta + X \sin\theta)

Vd=1.732×200×0.15×(0.193×0.85+0.072×0.527)V_d = 1.732 \times 200 \times 0.15 \times (0.193 \times 0.85 + 0.072 \times 0.527)

Vd=1.732×200×0.15×(0.164+0.038)V_d = 1.732 \times 200 \times 0.15 \times (0.164 + 0.038)

Vd=52.0×0.202=10.5VV_d = 52.0 \times 0.202 = 10.5V

Percentage drop: %Vd=10.5480×100=2.2%\%V_d = \frac{10.5}{480} \times 100 = 2.2\%

Result: Acceptable—within 3% branch circuit guideline.

Power Loss: Detailed Analysis

Power loss represents electrical energy converted to heat in conductors. Unlike voltage drop (which affects functionality), power loss affects economics—wasted energy costs money and generates unwanted heat.

Power Loss Formulas

DC and Single-Phase AC: Ploss=I2R=Vd2RP_{loss} = I^2 R = \frac{V_d^2}{R}

Three-Phase AC: Ploss=3I2RP_{loss} = 3 I^2 R

In terms of conductor parameters: Ploss=I2×ρ×LAP_{loss} = I^2 \times \rho \times \frac{L}{A}

Where:

  • II = current (amperes)
  • RR = total conductor resistance (ohms)
  • ρ\rho = resistivity (1.72 × 10⁻⁸ Ω·m for copper)
  • LL = total conductor length (meters)
  • AA = cross-sectional area (m²)

The I²R Reality

The squared relationship between current and power loss has profound implications:

Current (% of rated)Power Loss (% of full-load loss)
25%6.25%
50%25%
75%56%
100%100%
125%156%

Power Loss Economic Analysis

Annual energy loss cost: Cost=Ploss×Hours×RateCost = P_{loss} \times Hours \times Rate

For continuous operation (8,760 hours/year):

  • 100W loss at $0.10/kWh = $87.60/year
  • 1 kW loss at $0.10/kWh = $876/year
  • 10 kW loss at $0.10/kWh = $8,760/year

Example Calculation: Power Loss

Same Feeder: Power Loss Analysis

Given (from previous example):

  • Current: 200A
  • Conductor: 95mm² copper, 150m each phase
  • R = 0.193 Ω/km = 0.0193 Ω per 100m
  • Total resistance per phase: 0.0193 × 1.5 = 0.029 Ω
  • Continuous operation: 8,760 hours/year
  • Electricity rate: $0.10/kWh

Calculate power loss:

Ploss=3×I2×R=3×2002×0.029P_{loss} = 3 \times I^2 \times R = 3 \times 200^2 \times 0.029

Ploss=3×40,000×0.029=3,480W=3.48kWP_{loss} = 3 \times 40,000 \times 0.029 = 3,480W = 3.48 kW

Annual energy cost: Cost=3.48×8,760×0.10=$3,048/year\text{Cost} = 3.48 \times 8,760 \times 0.10 = \$3{,}048/\text{year}

Evaluation: If upgrading to 120mm² conductor reduces R to 0.023 Ω/100m:

  • New power loss: 3 × 40,000 × (0.023 × 1.5) = 2,760W
  • Savings: 720W × 8,760 × $0.10 = $631/year
  • Upgrade cost: ~$1,500 for additional copper
  • Payback: 2.4 years

Side-by-Side Comparison

When Voltage Drop Matters Most

  • Motor starting: Motors need adequate voltage for starting torque
  • Long branch circuits: Residential circuits over 30m (100 ft)
  • Sensitive electronics: Data centers, medical equipment
  • Lighting quality: Dimming affects visual comfort and productivity
  • Code compliance: Staying within recommended limits

When Power Loss Matters Most

  • Continuous loads: 24/7 operation amplifies losses
  • High-current circuits: I² makes large loads expensive
  • Energy-intensive facilities: Manufacturing, data centers
  • Utility billing: Demand charges based on peak losses
  • Conductor heating: Affects ampacity and insulation life

Minimizing Both: Design Strategies

Strategy 1: Increase Conductor Size

Larger conductors reduce both voltage drop and power loss proportionally. This is the most straightforward approach.

Conductor SizeResistance (Ω/km)Relative DropRelative Loss
16mm²1.151.001.00
25mm²0.7270.630.63
35mm²0.5240.460.46
50mm²0.3870.340.34
70mm²0.2680.230.23
95mm²0.1930.170.17

Strategy 2: Increase System Voltage

Higher voltage reduces current for the same power, dramatically reducing both losses:

VoltageCurrent (for 100 kW)Relative DropRelative Loss
120V833A1.001.00
240V417A0.500.25
480V208A0.250.06
600V167A0.200.04

Strategy 3: Improve Power Factor

Low power factor increases current for the same real power, increasing both voltage drop and power loss:

Power FactorCurrent (for 100 kW real power)Relative Loss
1.00100%100%
0.90111%123%
0.80125%156%
0.70143%204%
0.60167%278%

Strategy 4: Reduce Distance

Shorter cable runs reduce both proportionally. Consider:

  • Locating transformers closer to loads
  • Distributed vs. centralized distribution
  • Load center optimization

Common Calculation Mistakes

MistakeImpactPrevention
Forgetting return pathUnderestimate drop by 50%Always multiply by 2 (or √3 for 3-phase)
Using DC resistance for ACUnderestimate AC dropInclude reactance for cables ≥50mm²
Ignoring temperature effectsUndersize for hot environmentsUse resistance at operating temperature
Ignoring power factorUnderestimate voltage dropInclude reactive component in calculation
Mixing units (Ω/km vs Ω/m)Orders of magnitude errorsVerify units before calculation
Forgetting to square current for lossUnderestimate power lossP = I²R, not IR

Practical Application Guide

Sizing Process

  1. Calculate ampacity requirement (thermal limit)
  2. Select minimum conductor from ampacity tables
  3. Calculate voltage drop with selected conductor
  4. If drop exceeds limit, increase conductor size
  5. Calculate power loss with selected conductor
  6. Perform economic analysis for larger conductor
  7. Select final size based on economics and constraints

Economic Optimization Example

Economic Conductor Sizing: 50A Circuit, 100m

Given:

  • Load: 50A continuous at 480V 3-phase
  • Length: 100m
  • Operation: 8,000 hours/year
  • Electricity: $0.12/kWh
  • Acceptable payback: 5 years
Size (mm²)R (Ω/100m)V-DropLoss (W)Annual CostWire Cost
160.1152.0%863W$829$480
250.0731.3%548W$526$720
350.0520.9%390W$374$1,020

Analysis:

  • 16mm² to 25mm²: Save $303/year for $240 extra. Payback: 0.8 years ✔
  • 25mm² to 35mm²: Save $152/year for $300 extra. Payback: 2.0 years ✔

Result: 35mm² is economically optimal within 5-year criteria, despite 16mm² meeting code.

Related Tools

Use these calculators to analyze your electrical circuits:

Key Takeaways

  • Voltage Drop (Vd=IRV_d = IR): Affects equipment operation; code limits 3-5%
  • Power Loss (P=I2RP = I^2R): Affects operating costs; no code limit
  • Relationship: Power loss = Voltage drop × Current
  • Scaling: Voltage drop linear with current; power loss quadratic
  • Both reduced by: Larger conductors, higher voltage, better power factor
  • Design priority: Meet voltage drop limits first, then optimize for power loss economics

Further Reading

References & Standards

  • NEC 210.19(A), 215.2(A): Voltage drop recommendations for branch circuits and feeders
  • IEC 60364-5-52: Low-voltage electrical installations, cable sizing and selection
  • IEEE 141 (Red Book): Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution

Disclaimer: This comparison provides general technical guidance based on international standards. Actual calculations should account for specific installation conditions, temperature corrections, and local code requirements. Always verify compliance with applicable codes before final design.

Frequently Asked Questions