Inductor Energy Calculator

Inductors store electrical energy in a magnetic field generated by current flowing through a coil of wire. When current flows through an inductor, it creates a magnetic field surrounding the conductor according to Ampère's law. This magnetic field represents stored energy that can be recovered when the current decreases. Unlike capacitors that store energy in an electric field between plates, inductors store energy in a magnetic field within and around their core material. This fundamental difference creates complementary behaviors—capacitors oppose voltage changes while inductors oppose current changes.

Fundamental Energy Relationship

The energy stored in an inductor depends on both its inductance and the square of the current flowing through it: E = ½LI². Energy increases with the square of current, meaning doubling the current quadruples the stored energy. A 100µH inductor carrying 1A stores 50 microjoules, but the same inductor at 2A stores 200 microjoules—four times the energy despite only double the current. This nonlinear relationship makes current the dominant factor in inductor energy storage.

Inductance and Energy Storage

Inductance quantifies an inductor's ability to store energy in its magnetic field per unit current squared, measured in henries (H). One henry stores one joule of energy when carrying one ampere of current. Practical inductors range from nanohenries (nH) in RF circuits to thousands of henries in superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) systems. Power supply filter inductors typically range from microhenries (µH) to millihenries (mH). Inductance depends on coil geometry, number of turns, core material permeability, and physical dimensions according to L = (µN²A)/l, where µ is core permeability, N is number of turns, A is cross-sectional area, and l is coil length.

Magnetic Core Materials and Saturation

Inductor core material profoundly affects energy storage capability and performance characteristics. Air core inductors use no magnetic material, providing linear inductance independent of current but requiring many turns for substantial inductance values. Ferrite cores concentrate magnetic flux, increasing inductance by 100-10,000× compared to air cores, but saturate at moderate flux densities (0.3-0.5 Tesla), causing inductance to collapse when current exceeds the saturation limit.

Powder cores using distributed air gaps (iron powder, sendust, molypermalloy) provide soft saturation characteristics—inductance decreases gradually rather than collapsing abruptly as current increases. These cores excel in DC-biased applications like switching power supply inductors where high DC current flows continuously. Iron powder cores cost less but have higher losses than sendust or MPP (molypermalloy powder) cores. The distributed air gap reduces effective permeability (typically 10-100) but allows operation at much higher flux densities without hard saturation.

Laminated iron cores used in power transformers and large inductors achieve very high inductance with minimal air gaps but suffer from eddy current losses at high frequencies. Silicon steel laminations work well at 50-400Hz but become lossy above 1kHz. Nanocrystalline and amorphous metal cores provide superior performance at 10-100kHz with lower losses than ferrites, though at significantly higher cost. Superconducting coils eliminate resistive losses entirely, enabling extremely high inductance values (hundreds of henries) with persistent currents, though requiring cryogenic cooling infrastructure.

Current Build-Up and RL Time Constant

When voltage is applied across an inductor, current increases gradually rather than instantaneously, following an exponential rise characterized by the L/R time constant τ = L/R. Current reaches 63.2% of final value in one time constant, 86.5% in two time constants, and 95% in three time constants. After five time constants (5L/R), current reaches 99.3% of steady state—effectively fully established. A 100µH inductor with 1Ω total series resistance has τ = 100µs, reaching steady-state current in approximately 500µs.

The inductor's resistance to current change manifests as back-EMF (electromotive force) according to V = L(di/dt). Faster current changes produce higher opposing voltages. This property enables switching power supply operation—rapidly changing current through the inductor generates voltage that transfers energy between input and output. A buck converter switches inductor current on and off thousands of times per second, with the inductor smoothing current ripple and transferring energy efficiently.

When current flow is interrupted (switch opens), the collapsing magnetic field induces very high voltages attempting to maintain current flow. This flyback voltage can reach hundreds or thousands of volts, potentially destroying switches or other components. Snubber circuits, flyback diodes, or active clamping protect circuits from inductive kickback. The energy stored in the inductor must be dissipated or recovered—simply opening the circuit creates destructive voltage spikes.

DC Resistance and Copper Losses

Real inductors exhibit DC resistance (DCR) from the copper or aluminum wire forming the coil. DCR causes power dissipation proportional to I²R, generating heat and reducing efficiency. A 100µH inductor with 50mΩ DCR carrying 3A dissipates 450mW (3² × 0.05 = 0.45W) continuously. This heating raises temperature, increasing copper resistance further through the positive temperature coefficient of conductor resistance (0.4%/°C for copper).

Power supply inductor selection balances inductance value against DCR. Larger inductance requires more turns or higher permeability core, generally increasing DCR. Thicker wire reduces DCR but limits turns that fit in available space. Litz wire (multiple fine strands woven to reduce skin effect and proximity effect) reduces AC resistance at high frequencies but costs more and remains bulky. At switching frequencies above 100kHz, AC resistance can exceed DC resistance by 2-5× due to skin effect and proximity effect losses.

Temperature rise from copper losses limits current capability. Inductor manufacturers specify saturation current (where inductance drops 10-30% due to core saturation) and RMS current rating (thermal limit for continuous operation). Exceeding saturation current causes soft or hard saturation depending on core type, reducing inductance and increasing ripple. Exceeding thermal rating causes overheating, insulation degradation, and eventual failure. Conservative design maintains operation below both limits with adequate safety margin (typically 20-30%).

Core Losses at High Frequency

AC magnetic fields induce core losses through hysteresis and eddy currents in magnetic materials. Hysteresis loss occurs as magnetic domains within the material reverse orientation with each AC cycle, dissipating energy as heat. Eddy current losses result from circulating currents induced in conductive core material by changing magnetic flux. Core loss increases with frequency and flux density, following empirical relationships that vary by material type.

Ferrite cores minimize eddy current losses through their high electrical resistivity but still exhibit hysteresis losses increasing with frequency. Manufacturers provide core loss density specifications (mW/cm³) as functions of frequency and flux density. A buck converter inductor operating at 500kHz might exhibit 50-200mW/cm³ core loss depending on ripple current amplitude. Total core loss equals loss density multiplied by core volume—larger cores dissipate more power even at the same loss density.

Switching power supply efficiency depends critically on total inductor losses (copper plus core). A poorly selected inductor can reduce overall converter efficiency by 3-5%. Modern high-efficiency designs target <1% inductor losses through careful core selection, optimal wire gauge, and appropriate switching frequency. Ultra-low-loss core materials (nanocrystalline, amorphous metal) enable higher frequency operation with lower losses but cost 5-10× more than standard ferrites, justified only in premium applications.

Energy Transfer in Switching Converters

Switching DC-DC converters exploit inductor energy storage for voltage conversion. Buck (step-down) converters store energy in the inductor during the ON state when current increases, then release energy to the load during the OFF state as current decreases. The inductor acts as an energy transfer element, accepting energy from the input and delivering it to the output with minimal loss. Continuous conduction mode (CCM) maintains positive current throughout the cycle, while discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) allows current to reach zero each cycle.

Boost (step-up) converters store energy in the inductor while the switch conducts (output disconnected), then transfer stored energy to the output at elevated voltage when the switch opens. The energy transfer follows E = ½L(I_peak²). Increasing peak current delivers more energy per cycle, enabling higher output power. Inductor value selection determines current ripple amplitude—smaller inductance produces higher ripple and peak current, requiring higher saturation current rating but enabling smaller physical size.

Flyback converters combine inductor and transformer functions in coupled inductors, storing energy in the magnetic field during ON time and transferring to the output through magnetic coupling during OFF time. The air gap in flyback transformers stores energy like an inductor (E = ½LI²) rather than transferring energy instantaneously like ideal transformers. This energy storage in the coupling mechanism distinguishes flyback topology from forward converters and enables isolated output with minimal components.

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage

Superconducting coils carrying persistent currents store energy with virtually zero resistive losses, enabling efficient long-term energy storage in magnetic fields. SMES systems use superconducting wire cooled below critical temperature (4.2K for NbTi in liquid helium, 77K for YBCO in liquid nitrogen) to achieve zero electrical resistance. Current circulates indefinitely in a closed superconducting loop without decay, maintaining the magnetic field and stored energy indefinitely.

SMES offers unique advantages for grid-scale energy storage: instantaneous response (<10ms), unlimited charge-discharge cycling with no degradation, high efficiency (95-98% round-trip), and fast power delivery (milliseconds to seconds). Disadvantages include high capital cost ($500-1000/kWh), continuous cryogenic system power consumption (1-5% of stored energy per hour), and safety considerations for large magnetic fields. SMES systems supplement or replace batteries for applications requiring fastest possible response—frequency regulation, voltage support, and power quality improvement in distribution grids.

Current installations demonstrate viability: a 2.5 MWh SMES system in Wisconsin provides grid stabilization with <20ms response time, far faster than battery systems (200-500ms). Economics remain challenging—high upfront costs and cryogenic operating expenses limit deployment to niche applications where instantaneous response justifies premium costs. Advances in high-temperature superconductors operating at liquid nitrogen temperatures (77K instead of 4.2K) could reduce costs by 40-50%, making SMES competitive with advanced batteries for sub-second response applications.